The Churchill myth

Users who are viewing this thread

lumpenstein

Active Member
Messages
1,538
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Everybody seems to hold Winston Churchill in such high regard but some really critisize his policies and decisions.

This is an old book but I was just noticing it now: VDARE.com: 07/23/08 - Buchanan On World War II, The National Question And Hitler's Posthumous Revenge

What would have happened if we had let Russia have Poland, make kissy-kissy with Hitler and let him and Stalin duke it out? Operation Barbarosa would have been a Godsend and German victory would have closed eastern Europe to Communism (and saved millions of lives).

Just a thought.
 
  • 18
    Replies
  • 483
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

lumpenstein

Active Member
Messages
1,538
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Sheer bullshit by a guy I used to agree with on some things. Buchannan is a nut. This proves it.

I want to know why the west was so eager to suck commie dick just to oppose Hitler. Churchill could have avoided a war that killed millions.

Oops! Sorry! He must have been Bush's hero! :rolleyes:
 

Zorak

The cake is a metaphor
Messages
9,923
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
He was fucking awesome.

He stole charity boxes from shops and bars and wished Ghandi had been trampled by an elephant.

what a man
 

lumpenstein

Active Member
Messages
1,538
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
This is not worthy of a response. :thumbdown

Is Curchill being misquoted?

As Pat notes, "Churchill was no egalitarian humanist". He was an avid supporter of eugenics, who warned that Britain’s population of 120,000 feeble minded "should, if possible, be segregated under proper conditions so that their curse died with them and was not transmitted to future generations".[Page 401]
Churchill had no problem with the idea of some races expanding their living space: "I do not admit…that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia...by the fact that a stronger race, a higher grade race…has come and taken their place." [p. 403]


Jeez! Sounds like lorelai! :24:
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
Is Curchill being misquoted?

As Pat notes, "Churchill was no egalitarian humanist". He was an avid supporter of eugenics, who warned that Britain’s population of 120,000 feeble minded "should, if possible, be segregated under proper conditions so that their curse died with them and was not transmitted to future generations".[Page 401]
Churchill had no problem with the idea of some races expanding their living space: "I do not admit…that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia...by the fact that a stronger race, a higher grade race…has come and taken their place." [p. 403]


Jeez! Sounds like lorelai! :24:
what has that got to do with the stupidity of this thread.

Fits in with the title but not the first post
 

skyblue

KEEP THE FAITH
Messages
27,194
Reaction score
16
Tokenz
0.34z
churchill

the man who masterminded victory in 'the battle of britain'

the man who convinced america to join in the war,ensuring victory

the man who was slapped down by the americans when he wanted to drive the red army back into russia
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
churchill

the man who masterminded victory in 'the battle of britain'

the man who convinced america to join in the war,ensuring victory

the man who was slapped down by the americans when he wanted to drive the red army back into russia
he was not the only one slapped down

Mcarthur and Patton has similar thoughts
 

skyblue

KEEP THE FAITH
Messages
27,194
Reaction score
16
Tokenz
0.34z
I want to know why the west was so eager to suck commie dick just to oppose Hitler. Churchill could have avoided a war that killed millions.

Oops! Sorry! He must have been Bush's hero! :rolleyes:


possibly because hitler wanted world domination,the total extermination of the jews,gypsies and slavs and because his eyes were on america
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
I want to know why the west was so eager to suck commie dick just to oppose Hitler. Churchill could have avoided a war that killed millions.

Oops! Sorry! He must have been Bush's hero! :rolleyes:

Maybe because the Commies were on our side and we couldn't have won it without them, even if they committed terrible war crimes too, they wern't threatening to invade us though.

churchill

the man who convinced america to join in the war,ensuring victory

Actually, the USA only came in because of Pearl Harbour, nothing to do with Churchill at all.

The Russians pretty much won WW2 on their own.

Bullshit and a complete insult to my uncle who died fighting to keep the Nazis out, stop being so simplistic.

My opinion, Churchill was the right man at the right time. Everyone thought he was a scaremongerer like Bush. Unlike Bush though, he was spot on. He also made serious errors before that, it was him that was responsible for Gallipolli. He was also rather racist about Ghandi. I still admire him though for pulling us through the war, it was touch and go and I think most others would have failed.
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
"After World War II, in response to the perceived failures of the League of Nations, much more powerful international institutions—most notably, the United Nations—were created. They have continued to gain more power ever since."

Untill the USA said "fuck you!" when they wanted to invade Iraq and the most powerful Western nations joined in or tut tutted from a distance but didn't do anything meaningful about it and proved that the UN is in fact about as powerful as my dead grandma.
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
Peter the UN has always been a spineless group of idiots. An utter waste of money. They do some humanitarian good but that is about it. The UN never was powerful. IMO
 

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
I want to know why the west was so eager to suck commie dick just to oppose Hitler. Churchill could have avoided a war that killed millions.

Oops! Sorry! He must have been Bush's hero! :rolleyes:

At the time, I think the Germans were regarded as more of a threat than the Russians so it was an alliance of convenience. Once the Germans were neutralized the cold war with the Communists started.
 

Strauss

Active Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
At the time, I think the Germans were regarded as more of a threat than the Russians so it was an alliance of convenience.

How about "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" idea. You read the thoughts of FDR and his war team they had no delusions about Stalin. Churchill would have been just as happy if the war continued after the Nazi's surrendered and the Soviet Union pushed back.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
So it's just a myth that they were begging the Allies to open up a second front? :rolleyes:
lol just trolling.


However, I do not think WW2 would have been won if there was no Russian Front. Britain would have been eventually taken over due to all the extra forces deployed against it.
 
78,875Threads
2,185,392Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top