Tell All Books

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
JanieDough

JanieDough

V.I.P User
Messages
14,684
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
What are some you have read or would love to be written?

I haven't read any, but I would love to read OJ's (though I wouldn't want to buy it) and I can't wait til MJ's children (the ones he has custody of or the ones he molested) grow up and write theirs.
 
  • 35
    Replies
  • 996
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list
P

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.07z
On the run by Gina and Gregg Hill (children of Henry Hill of Goodfellas fame) The real story is nowhere near as glamorous. Henry Hill is a comple cunt, in and outside the law.
 
M

MoonOwl

In Memoriam - RIP
Messages
14,573
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
I did read the book Princess Diana's butler put out.... But I think that's the only one I've ever read?

hehehehehehehehehe..... If you can believe him, she called "The Family" a bunch of Lizards... I bet David Icke loved that one!
 
P

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.07z
MoonOwl said:
I did read the book Princess Diana's butler put out.... But I think that's the only one I've ever read?

hehehehehehehehehe..... If you can believe him, she called "The Family" a bunch of Lizards... I bet David Icke loved that one!
Click to expand...

Paul Burrell is a slimy cunt who is just cashing in while hypocritically proffessing his loyalty to Diana and her kids at every opportunity when money is involved. William and Harry cant stand him. Haven't read the book but I wouldn't think a lot of it is accurate.
 
M

Margene

Member
Messages
10,191
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Peter Parka said:
On the run by Gina and Gregg Hill (children of Henry Hill of Goodfellas fame) The real story is nowhere near as glamorous. Henry Hill is a comple cunt, in and outside the law.
Click to expand...

Now that would be very interesting. I loved "Goodfellas", but crime and the life around it has to suck.
 
Goat Whisperer

Goat Whisperer

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
JanieDough said:
What are some you have read or would love to be written?

I haven't read any, but I would love to read OJ's (though I wouldn't want to buy it) and I can't wait til MJ's children (the ones he has custody of or the ones he molested) grow up and write theirs.
Click to expand...

ya it would be cool if they grew up and wrote books about how there parents told them to act like they were molested for millions of dollars too :ninja
 
P

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.07z
....and here we go again.:popcorn2:

Its still amusing how all these Michael Jackson nuts here have still yet to answer how multiple kids identified his genitalia if he is as innocent as they say?
 
pinkporridge

pinkporridge

V.I.Pinkporridge
Messages
6,485
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Peter Parka said:
....and here we go again.:popcorn2:

Its still amusing how all these Michael Jackson nuts here have still yet to answer how multiple kids identified his genitalia if he is as innocent as they say?
Click to expand...

i just had images of them drawing a cock like the boys did at primary school
 
Tangerine

Tangerine

Slightly Acidic
Messages
3,679
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.12z
Peter Parka said:
....and here we go again.:popcorn2:

Its still amusing how all these Michael Jackson nuts here have still yet to answer how multiple kids identified his genitalia if he is as innocent as they say?
Click to expand...

That's a court-room trick like OJ trying on the glove that didn't fit. Who knows what the kids were coached to say and do? And how exactly is a child's drawing going to "identify" any persons genitals definitively? No one in the public nor the media ever saw those photos and drawings. The claim that they "matched" was made by spokespeople for the prosectution.

And that didn't occur with "multiple kids." The photo was a piece of evidence gathered for the 1993 case that was not allowed to be entered in the 2003 trial. If that were a conclusive piece of evidence, don't you think the judge would have allowed it in the trial?
 
P

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.07z
Tangerine said:
And that didn't occur with "multiple kids." The photo was a piece of evidence gathered for the 1993 case that was not allowed to be entered in the 2003 trial. If that were a conclusive piece of evidence, don't you think the judge would have allowed it in the trial?
Click to expand...

Seeing that trail was dropped thanks to MJ paying that kid several million dollars (there's a good indication of his innocence for you) I seriously doubt by law that it would be lawful for it to be submitted in a seperate trial.Not entirely sure on US laws (though I find them rather fucked up in many ways (OJ getting cleared of murder but still being sucessfully sued for it as one example)) but over here, that previous stuff would not even be allowed to be mentioned as it would prejudice the trial (admittedly when MJ is invoved, you would be hard pressed to find someone who wasn't aware of it.

As a side note, I think OJ tricked people about that glove by his acting. I honestly thought that it seemed to fit him fine.
 
Tangerine

Tangerine

Slightly Acidic
Messages
3,679
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.12z
Peter Parka said:
Seeing that trail was dropped thanks to MJ paying that kid several million dollars (there's a good indication of his innocence for you)
Click to expand...

You should do a little digging around to find out the facts of both cases - especially about the financial interests of the parties with MJ BEFORE they brought allegations.

And if you believe that settling a case is always an indication of guilt - then I suppose there's nothing anyone could say that would matter. You can choose to believe what you want, I guess. I tend to form my opinions based on actual facts.
 
P

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.07z
Look, can we drop this MJ arguement? This thread isn't even about that. There's no point to it anyway, you can't argue with people who swear that black is white (pardon the pun) :24:
 
79,550Threads
2,190,540Messages
5,003Members
Back
Top