Study finds no marijuana link to lung cancer

Users who are viewing this thread

!

Active Member
Messages
749
Reaction score
16
Tokenz
0.19z
Study finds no marijuana link to lung cancer

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Marijuana smoking does not increase a person's risk of developing lung cancer, according to the findings of a new study at the University of California Los Angeles that surprised even the researchers.

They had expected to find that a history of heavy marijuana use, like cigarette smoking, would increase the risk of cancer.

Instead, the study, which compared the lifestyles of 611 Los Angeles County lung cancer patients and 601 patients with head and neck cancers with those of 1,040 people without cancer, found no elevated cancer risk for even the heaviest pot smokers. It did find a 20-fold increased risk of lung cancer in people who smoked two or more packs of cigarettes a day.

The study results were presented in San Diego on Tuesday at a meeting of the American Thoracic Society.

The study was confined to people under age 60 since baby boomers were the most likely age group to have long-term exposure to marijuana, said Dr. Donald Tashkin, senior researcher and professor at the UCLA School of Medicine.

The results should not be taken as a blank check to smoke pot, which has been associated with problems like cognitive impairment and chronic bronchitis, said Dr. John Hansen-Flaschen, chief of pulmonary and critical care at the University of Pennsylvania Health System in Philadelphia. He was not involved in the study.

Previous studies showed marijuana tar contained about 50 percent more of the chemicals linked to lung cancer, compared with tobacco tar, Tashkin said. In addition, smoking a marijuana joint deposits four times more tar in the lungs than smoking an equivalent amount of tobacco.

"Marijuana is packed more loosely than tobacco, so there's less filtration through the rod of the cigarette, so more particles will be inhaled," Tashkin said in a statement. "And marijuana smokers typically smoke differently than tobacco smokers -- they hold their breath about four times longer, allowing more time for extra fine particles to deposit in the lung."

He theorized that tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, a chemical in marijuana smoke that produces its psychotropic effect, may encourage aging, damaged cells to die off before they become cancerous.

Hansen-Flaschen also cautioned a cancer-marijuana link could emerge as baby boomers age and there may be smaller population groups, based on genetics or other factors, still at risk for marijuana-related cancers.

source article
 
  • 53
    Replies
  • 2K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

SloMoFo

Active Member
Messages
546
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Re: RE: Study finds no marijuana link to lung cancer

JMilley said:
it's a theory :D

actually thats medically proven ..go back and read the spiel on the receptor sites

it prevents people from retaining information
 

JMilley

Member
Messages
459
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Re: RE: Study finds no marijuana link to lung cancer

2000Si said:
JMilley said:
in your face, James :D

You're still at risk for immediate heart attacks.

So... who cares?

Isn't everyone in the rist of immediate heart attacks? My grandfather died of a heart attack, and he didn't smoke.
 

OUZBnd

Active Member
Messages
2,807
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.06z
Re: RE: Study finds no marijuana link to lung cancer

JMilley said:
in your face, James :D

Did you even read the article, or just the title.


The results should not be taken as a blank check to smoke pot, which has been associated with problems like cognitive impairment and chronic bronchitis, said Dr. John Hansen-Flaschen, chief of pulmonary and critical care at the University of Pennsylvania Health System in Philadelphia. He was not involved in the study.

Previous studies showed marijuana tar contained about 50 percent more of the chemicals linked to lung cancer, compared with tobacco tar, Tashkin said. In addition, smoking a marijuana joint deposits four times more tar in the lungs than smoking an equivalent amount of tobacco.
"Marijuana is packed more loosely than tobacco, so there's less filtration through the rod of the cigarette, so more particles will be inhaled," Tashkin said in a statement. "And marijuana smokers typically smoke differently than tobacco smokers -- they hold their breath about four times longer, allowing more time for extra fine particles to deposit in the lung."

He theorized that tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, a chemical in marijuana smoke that produces its psychotropic effect, may encourage aging, damaged cells to die off before they become cancerous.

Has it sunk in yet?
 

TheOriginalJames

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,395
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Re: RE: Study finds no marijuana link to lung cancer

JMilley said:
2000Si said:
JMilley said:
in your face, James :D

You're still at risk for immediate heart attacks.

So... who cares?

Isn't everyone in the rist of immediate heart attacks? My grandfather died of a heart attack, and he didn't smoke.

Oh thats nice, you have a family history of heart attacks and you think Pot doesn't do anything.

So basically you're tripling your chances.
 

Mrs Behavin

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,411
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.55z
Re: RE: Study finds no marijuana link to lung cancer

JMilley said:
2000Si said:
JMilley said:
in your face, James :D

You're still at risk for immediate heart attacks.

So... who cares?

Isn't everyone in the rist of immediate heart attacks? My grandfather died of a heart attack, and he didn't smoke.

Your chances of living longer all depend on whether you smoke, drink smoke marijuana, overweight, :blah
The point Si is trying to make, is that your chances of outliving everyone else your age are slim if you keep smoking pot.
 

TheOriginalJames

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,395
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
:agree On top of that, my point, to overshadow your ignorance, is to say that smoking Marijuana still isn't as healthy as you want to believe it is. I know that smoking cigs and drinking isn't healthy for me, but at least I'm not trying to deny it's short/long term effects on my body.
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top