Did Time ask every single person in America?
If not, then their data is WRONG!
The method to which they surveyed is provided in the article.
Sampling groups can be flawed, but by only the marginal percentage that is the one you posted, which is 3.1 plus or minus. On social issues, sampling groups tend to be more accurate on simple answer issues like this. On things like Vietnam where the issue is INCREDIBLY complicated and the answers will be too vague or complex to get a straight answer, sampling groups would be useless.The poll involved telephone interviews with 1,004 adults from Oct. 23-25. It had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points.
So 1,004 adults is a good indication of what some what 300 million+ American adults think? I can't believe you'd even post this as legitimate.
The method to which they surveyed is provided in the article.
Sampling groups can be flawed, but by only the marginal percentage that is the one you posted, which is 3.1 plus or minus. On social issues, sampling groups tend to be more accurate on simple answer issues like this. On things like Vietnam where the issue is INCREDIBLY complicated and the answers will be too vague or complex to get a straight answer, sampling groups would be useless.
But you can check other studies if you want to. Most of them point in the same direction that this one concludes to.
In this situation sampling groups can be a pretty good indicator on how the average person feels about a simple social issue compared to others.It dosn't matter. If they didn't ask everybody, then they can't PROVE anything.
Why were they so racist in their poll? Were women and minorities represented properly???
There were various questions asked in that one that were not simple yes or no answers.I'm fairly certain that the question to vets asking if they would fight in Vietnam again even though they knew the outcome is a pretty simple question.
Wait where do you get this racist thing from? it says that they polled minorities also.
I can't, but there's no reason to think that the kkk ran the survey.I'll ask you one last time. How can they PROVE this???? :willy_nilly:
I can't, but there's no reason to think that the kkk ran the survey.
Were minorities in your "facts" properly represented???
It dosn't matter. If they didn't ask everybody, then they can't PROVE anything.
Why were they so racist in their poll? Were women and minorities represented properly???
It was a joke in response to AEF saying this in another thread:C'mon. Really. You can't expect them to ask everybody. That is totally unrealistic. Surveys aren't conducted like that.
A lot of the numbers look a bit high to me.
These are the ones that I find most strange:
91% of Vietnam Veterans say they are glad they served.
74% say they would serve again, even knowing the outcome.
Unless he went to every vet and interviewed them, his data is false.
It was a joke in response to AEF saying this in another thread:
It was a joke in response to AEF saying this in another thread:
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.