Polanski Arrested

Users who are viewing this thread

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Good! About time the nonce was made to pay for his crime!:thumbup

Roman Polanski in Swiss detention
Film director Roman Polanski has been taken into custody in Switzerland and faces extradition to the US for having sex with a 13-year-old girl in 1977.
Mr Polanski, 76, was detained in Zurich on Saturday as he travelled from France to collect a lifetime achievement award at the Zurich Film Festival.
He is being held under a 2005 international alert issued by the US.
Mr Polanski has been to Switzerland before, but this time US authorities apparently knew of his trip in advance.
That gave them time to prepare the groundwork for his arrest and send a provisional arrest warrant to Swiss authorities, judicial officials said.
A Swiss spokesman said the US would now have to make a formal extradition request.
The director can contest his detention and any extradition decision in the Swiss courts, he added.
Mr Polanski's lawyer, Georges Kiejman, said he planned to challenge his client's arrest.
"We are going to try to lift the arrest warrant in Zurich," he told France Info radio. "The [extradition] convention between Switzerland and the United States is not very clear."
Mr Polanski fled the US in 1978 after pleading guilty to unlawful sexual intercourse with an underage girl.
He was initially indicted on six counts and faced up to life in prison.
In recent years, he has tried to have the rape case dismissed, claiming the original judge, who is now dead, arranged a plea bargain but later reneged.

CASE TIMELINE
1977 - Polanski admits unlawful sex with Samantha Geimer, 13, in Los Angeles
1978 - flees to Britain after US arrest warrant is issued
1978 - immediately moves to France where he holds citizenship
1978 - settles in France, where he is protected by France's limited extradition with US
2008 - Polanski's lawyer demands case be dismissed and hearing moved out of LA court
2009 - Polanski's request to have hearing outside LA is denied

Earlier this year, Judge Peter Espinoza agreed there was misconduct by the judge in the original case, but said Mr Polanski must return to the US to apply for dismissal.
Mr Polanski's lawyers said he would not return to the US because he would be immediately arrested as a fugitive.
The victim at the centre of the case, Samantha Geimer, has previously asked for the charges to be dropped, saying the continued publication of details "causes harm to me, my husband and children".
She has also called the court's insistence that Mr Polanski appear in person "a cruel joke".
'Shock and dismay'
The Paris-born Polish filmmaker - who is also a French citizen - has not set foot in the US for more than 30 years.
His Oscar for directing 2002 film The Pianist was collected by Harrison Ford, who had previously starred in his 1988 thriller, Frantic.
France's culture minister said he was "dumbfounded" by Mr Polanski's detention in Switzerland.
Frederic Mitterrand said he "strongly regrets that a new ordeal is being inflicted on someone who has already experienced so many of them".
He added that French President Nicolas Sarkozy was "following the case with great attention and shares the minister's hope that the situation can be quickly resolved".
The organisers of the Zurich Film Festival said Polanski's detention had caused "shock and dismay", but that they would go ahead with a planned retrospective of the director's work.
A special ceremony is planned for Sunday night "to allow everyone to express their solidarity for Roman Polanski and their admiration for his work", festival managers said in a statement.
Meanwhile, British author Robert Harris - who had been working with Mr Polanski on a film adaptation of his novel The Ghost - said he was taken aback by the weekend's events.
"One of the reasons I'm absolutely shocked and stunned by his arrest is that we have worked together extensively in Switzerland, where he has a home," Harris said.
"If he was such a wanted criminal why did they let him own a house and travel back and forth freely?"
But justice officials in both Switzerland and the US said the difference this time was that a provisional arrest warrant had been sent.
William Sorukas, chief of the US Marshals Service's domestic investigations branch, told the Associated Press that investigators learned about the trip days in advance and were therefore able to prepare for an arrest.
"There have been other times through the years when we have learned of his potential travel but either those efforts fell through or he didn't make the trip," he said.




Story from BBC NEWS:
 
  • 21
    Replies
  • 1K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Staci

old, but new
Messages
20,018
Reaction score
14
Tokenz
0.00z
you know he sued vanity fair in 2005 for a libel suit and won.

im glad he finally got caught
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Cant believe a load of politicians and Hollywood bigwigs are now backing him and saying his arrest is out of order, it's a fucked up world! :willy_nilly:
 

Staci

old, but new
Messages
20,018
Reaction score
14
Tokenz
0.00z
Cant believe a load of politicians and Hollywood bigwigs are now backing him and saying his arrest is out of order, it's a fucked up world! :willy_nilly:

i believe their complaint is that it has been 30 years so why now? people magazine talked to the 13 year old that he slept with in 2007 and she would like some closure to this.
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
i believe their complaint is that it has been 30 years so why now? people magazine talked to the 13 year old that he slept with in 2007 and she would like some closure to this.

A rediculous argument, time dosen't make his crime any less serious, he would have paid the price by now if he hadn't taken the cowards way out and gone on the trot.
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
from what I am reading the trial was screwed up. Polanskis lawyer had filed a suit seeking to overturn or dismiss the charges. The judge said no trial unless Polanski comes back. Now that his hand is forced the pundits think he will be let off since the victim said she is not interested in a retrial.
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
about damn time... I just hope that he actually stands trial and doesn't get let off like I've been hearing might happen
 

Tangerine

Slightly Acidic
Messages
3,679
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
about damn time... I just hope that he actually stands trial and doesn't get let off like I've been hearing might happen

He's already signed a guilty plea, 30 years ago. There cannot be another trial. the charges were dismissed back then.

While I don't condone what he did back then, the fact is that he entered into a legal plea agreement and served the sentence assigned by the judge. I can't support the idea that the court gets a "do-over" because a crooked judge fucked up the original case, and had since died. If people think he got off too light... blame the judge and prosecutors that made the deal in the first place.
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
He's already signed a guilty plea, 30 years ago. There cannot be another trial. the charges were dismissed back then.

While I don't condone what he did back then, the fact is that he entered into a legal plea agreement and served the sentence assigned by the judge. I can't support the idea that the court gets a "do-over" because a crooked judge fucked up the original case, and had since died. If people think he got off too light... blame the judge and prosecutors that made the deal in the first place.

He never served the sentence. He fled. Thus why they want to extradite him

He never was actually sentenced it appears???



Lawyer: Polanski will fight extradition to the US - Yahoo! News

Authorities in Los Angeles consider Polanski a "convicted felon and fugitive." The director had pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual intercourse in 1977 with a 13-year-old girl. He was sent to prison for 42 days but then the judge tried to renege on the plea bargain. On the day of his sentencing in 1978, aware the judge would sentence him to more prison time, Polanski fled to France.

............................................................................

Polanski has asked a U.S. appeals court in California to overturn a judges' refusal to throw out his case. He claims misconduct by the now-deceased judge who had arranged a plea bargain and then reneged on it.
His victim, Samantha Geimer, who long ago identified herself, has joined in Polanski's bid for dismissal, saying she wants the case to be over. She sued Polanski and reached an undisclosed settlement.
Earlier this year, Superior Court Judge Peter Espinoza in Los Angeles dismissed Polanski's bid to throw out the case because the director failed to appear in court, but said there was "substantial misconduct" in the handling of the original case.
Espinoza said he reviewed not only legal documents, but also watched the HBO documentary, "Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired," which suggests there was behind-the-scenes manipulations by a now-retired prosecutor not assigned to the case.
 

Tangerine

Slightly Acidic
Messages
3,679
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
He never served the sentence. He fled. Thus why they want to extradite him

He never was actually sentenced it appears???



Lawyer: Polanski will fight extradition to the US - Yahoo! News

That's the crux of the whole issue. For signing the plea agreement, he was told he'd haveto spend 90 days in a psychiatric facility before the official sentencing. If, in the opinion of the doctors there, he was deemed to not be mentally ill or a danger to others, the judge would sentence him to time served in that facility. Polanski did his part, and was released by the doctrs after 42 days with a clean bill. The day before the sentencing, he was made aware that the judge had been involved in inappropriate conduct involving his case, and may likely reneg on the plea agreement and sentence him to additional jail time. He fled in protest.

So while he was not "officially" sentenced, he did sign a plea agreement with the LA County prosecutors, who approved the judges original sentence plan.

It should be noted that the judge was later removed from the case and barred from any dealing with Polanski or the case.
 

Pabst

Active Member
Messages
2,009
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
i hope he rots in a prison cell the rest of his life.

you dont plead guilty as part of a plea bargain and then hide in another country to get out of being punished.
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
A judge does not denege on a plea agreement.

The plea agreement is between the DA and the defendant.

The judge can rule however he wishes
 
78,874Threads
2,185,388Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top