BreakfastSurreal
Well-Known Member
I read this somewhere and thought it would be a good topic for debate.
Since the demise of Latin in the 15th century the world has lacked an official language of communication. The EU has two working languages (French and English) while the UN has six (French, Chinese, Arabic, Russian, English and Spanish). Many have since argued that it would be easier and contribute to global harmony if we could agree on one standard language. In fact L. L. Zamenhof created the language Esperanto specifically for this purpose at the end of the 19th century. However since then many have viewed English as a de-facto global language with local dialects like Singlish (generating from singapore) being spoken in many corners of the globes. The advance of English is resisted within many cultures who see language as an essential component of identity as well as a key tool for accessing the history and literatures of individual peoples.
I see the pros and cons of this topic...the good outweighs the bad I think, it would be way more conveniant for people to move around the globe and work in other countries and such. Also, some things are always lost in translation..and translation is time consuming and expensive. On the same token though, if we all switched to a unified language I think a lot of cultures would lose their diversity and lots of words would lose their literary distinction...for example, in the US we speak english, as well as in the UK...but because of different cultural differences, our english is NOT the same as theirs. There are words made up or used differently in each culture.
Since the demise of Latin in the 15th century the world has lacked an official language of communication. The EU has two working languages (French and English) while the UN has six (French, Chinese, Arabic, Russian, English and Spanish). Many have since argued that it would be easier and contribute to global harmony if we could agree on one standard language. In fact L. L. Zamenhof created the language Esperanto specifically for this purpose at the end of the 19th century. However since then many have viewed English as a de-facto global language with local dialects like Singlish (generating from singapore) being spoken in many corners of the globes. The advance of English is resisted within many cultures who see language as an essential component of identity as well as a key tool for accessing the history and literatures of individual peoples.
I see the pros and cons of this topic...the good outweighs the bad I think, it would be way more conveniant for people to move around the globe and work in other countries and such. Also, some things are always lost in translation..and translation is time consuming and expensive. On the same token though, if we all switched to a unified language I think a lot of cultures would lose their diversity and lots of words would lose their literary distinction...for example, in the US we speak english, as well as in the UK...but because of different cultural differences, our english is NOT the same as theirs. There are words made up or used differently in each culture.