Mucking About With HDR... ( big post )

Users who are viewing this thread

  • 176
    Replies
  • 4K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Guyzerr

Banned
Messages
12,928
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Sounds good.. Either day will be good for me next week.
:thumbup

PS I plan to just go out and shoot picture of that Moon tonight with Francis as the skies are nice and clear.. ( this was just for Zirc to be on topic :p ) so may be you and I can look at them then.. :D

I'm waiting for it to come up because it's fairly clear here. Kinda hazy though due to the high humidity. Now if I happen to get lucky and get a decent shot we can compare when we scarf down breakfast. :DNo point posting them here. ;)
 

Guyzerr

Banned
Messages
12,928
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
The planes do look good - I like the first and last ones best :)
Is it the effect or the planes that caught your attention? Just curious.

Your flower shot came out decent considering you used your cell. The last post kinda looks like it has a bit of a mild sepia filtered effect. :thumbup

One of the unfortunate things about these programs is they sure seem to make the noise stand out don't they.
 

anathelia

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,119
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.01z
That's kinda what I was thinking. The nice thing is they aren't overdone imo.

I agree. I think it brings out the clarity without making it look fake. I like how you can see more detail that way. :) And the clouds look really nice in the back, too.
 

purpledove

Seizing Life ♥
Messages
4,946
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I had been trying HDR and the attached is what i played with (taken with a P&S). However I had been reading more on it and am so confused about luminance and exposure values (Ev). The author gave these information:

DSLR: dr=300:1 or 7.0EV

Luminance values:

Star light = 0.001:1
Moon light = 0.1:1
Indoor light = 50:1
Sunny sky = 100,000:1

How do i incorporate these values into getting a higher dynamic range? I am aware of the limitations as to having a 1/2 sensor compared to full frame/sensor camera. But how does one use these values to come up with ISO, shutter speed and aperture settings while taking shots?


Original ( taken with a P&S a few years back )

IMG_1340-1.jpg

HDR ( I know i still need lots of improvement esp halos i think which made that pattern on the sky :( )

yosemite1-2.jpg

http://s1221.photobucket.com/albums/dd465/fireblossom3/?action=view&current=yosemite1-2.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

pinkporridge

V.I.Pinkporridge
Messages
6,485
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
only i do know a pretty cool metalic effect on photoshop that i have found works quite well on portraits. Would post porb work on landscape too. It can make things look a little HDR.
 

Tuffdisc

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,024
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
20.23z
I had been trying HDR and the attached is what i played with (taken with a P&S). However I had been reading more on it and am so confused about luminance and exposure values (Ev). The author gave these information:

DSLR: dr=300:1 or 7.0EV

Luminance values:

Star light = 0.001:1
Moon light = 0.1:1
Indoor light = 50:1
Sunny sky = 100,000:1

How do i incorporate these values into getting a higher dynamic range? I am aware of the limitations as to having a 1/2 sensor compared to full frame/sensor camera. But how does one use these values to come up with ISO, shutter speed and aperture settings while taking shots?


Original ( taken with a P&S a few years back )

IMG_1340-1.jpg

HDR ( I know i still need lots of improvement esp halos i think which made that pattern on the sky :( )

yosemite1-2.jpg

http://s1221.photobucket.com/albums/dd465/fireblossom3/?action=view¤t=yosemite1-2.jpg

You don't have a 1/2 sensor, you have a 1.6x sensor. Regardless of you having a crop sensor or not, the exposure will be the same on a crop and full frame sensor. I don't know what software you are using for HDR, I assume its not CS5

Those "halo effects" are caused by too much contrast in the post processing of the image...
 

purpledove

Seizing Life ♥
Messages
4,946
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
You don't have a 1/2 sensor, you have a 1.6x sensor. Regardless of you having a crop sensor or not, the exposure will be the same on a crop and full frame sensor. I don't know what software you are using for HDR, I assume its not CS5

Those "halo effects" are caused by too much contrast in the post processing of the image...

Yeah i just realized that, I meant 'crop' sensor as i knew the size of my sensor :p I thought though and read that full frames are able to get a higher range of dynamic light esp in landscape photography over a crop sensor? But of course with the use of software, one is able to edit that and get a higher range :tooth

veronica.png

This is my HDR attempt using CS5

I like it...just that area by the right top side had been my problem area. It changes color with the sky when it's not supposed to be blue :(

I need to learn more about HDR in CS5. Yup, i used a trial version of another software and not CS5.
 

purpledove

Seizing Life ♥
Messages
4,946
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I havent done any HDR and dont know a thing about it. so on this occasion i cant help :/

It's okay..;)

only i do know a pretty cool metalic effect on photoshop that i have found works quite well on portraits. Would post porb work on landscape too. It can make things look a little HDR.

Please post, I am excited to see it and learn the technique :nod:
 

Tuffdisc

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,024
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
20.23z
Yeah i just realized that, I meant 'crop' sensor as i knew the size of my sensor :p I thought though and read that full frames are able to get a higher range of dynamic light esp in landscape photography over a crop sensor? But of course with the use of software, one is able to edit that and get a higher range :tooth



I like it...just that area by the right top side had been my problem area. It changes color with the sky when it's not supposed to be blue :(

I need to learn more about HDR in CS5. Yup, i used a trial version of another software and not CS5.

Better low light and dynamic range
 
80,546Threads
2,194,778Messages
5,014Members
Back
Top