Mischa Barton's Rep Says Cellulite Pictures Were Doctored

Users who are viewing this thread

Anastasia

Member
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Sure......

From IMDB:
Barton's Rep Says Cellulite Pictures Were Doctored

MV5BOTIyNzYyMTA1MF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMDE4NjgyMQ@@._V1._SY90_.jpg
A representative for Mischa Barton has hit out at money-hungry publications printing unflattering photos of the actress - insisting the images were manipulated in a bid to sell more magazine copies. Images of 22-year-old Barton, many of which showed her topless and with cellulite on her thighs, were splashed in various magazines and newspapers and online last week. And although Barton has insisted she's happy with her body, her spokesperson Lisa Perkins is adamant someone tampered with the photos to suit their own financial gain. Perkins tells The New York Daily News, "Those photos are doctored. I'm not saying she's perfect, nobody is. But they've given a 22-year-old woman the legs and bottom of an 80-year-old. Look at the shots that were taken shortly before on a beach in Los Angeles. Did she develop all that cellulite in a couple of weeks? There's a lot you can do with Photoshopping." Perkins also calls photographer Jamie Fawcett - who shot the images of the actress on vacation with her mother on Hamilton Island, off Australia's East Coast - a "parasite" out to make Barton look bad because "she called him out for taking the topless shots." She adds, "It is a shame that publications tend to highlight an issue that isn't fair to a young girl. However, sometimes these are the things that sell pictures." But the British Daily Mail newspaper, which also published the photos, stands by their authenticity, placing blame on Barton's bad habits: "The nasty habit (smoking) is one of the reasons (for) premature emergence of her cellulite."
 
  • 6
    Replies
  • 654
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Elle

Banned
Messages
5,157
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
She's always had huge amounts of cellulite, even when she was super skinny. She's gained weight, so I don't see the cellulite, like getting better or anything.

In any case, I see some plastic surgery in the very near future and a photo shoot, to say, "hey, look at me!! The pics really were doctored!"
 

SRC

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Who cares .. some people are gentically prone to cellulite. I have a friend who is like 5'1 and weighs maybe 80lbs soaking wet .. and her legs are covered in cellulite .. her mothers are too and she's of comparable size. It just happens to some of us, unfortunately.
 

Anastasia

Member
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Who cares .. some people are gentically prone to cellulite. I have a friend who is like 5'1 and weighs maybe 80lbs soaking wet .. and her legs are covered in cellulite .. her mothers are too and she's of comparable size. It just happens to some of us, unfortunately.

True. My mom is really fat (5'1" and nearly 200lbs) and she has almost none and when she's thinner she has none. I unfortunately did not inherit this. My mom also despite gaining/losing large amounts of weight and having 2 kids has no stretch makes. Again, I did not inherit this trait. :(
 

Elle

Banned
Messages
5,157
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I have 3 kids, no stretch marks to be found, and no sagging of tittage, either. My mom, while she may have been lucky, and thinner after 4, still got cellulite and stretch marks. The only thing I got from having kids was my tits shrank.
 

groundpounder

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,933
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I have 3 kids, no stretch marks to be found, and no sagging of tittage, either. My mom, while she may have been lucky, and thinner after 4, still got cellulite and stretch marks. The only thing I got from having kids was my tits shrank.
Now you're just braggin. Which is fine! :p

:pics:
 

Elle

Banned
Messages
5,157
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Been there done that, GP.



Anyhoots. I was in line at the grocery store tonight, and sitting right next to me was, lo and behold, the front cover of the magazine with the pics. I think they are doctored. ONLY because there were other celeb asses on the front, (with mass cellulite), and there is NO way the others ones mentioned looked like that. I say this, because I have seen some of the very same pics published by more reputable media and they looked nothing like these.
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top