Minutes To Midnight?

Users who are viewing this thread

Dodge_Sniper

Active Member
Messages
4,791
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I'm only just recently finding out about this. Anybody else hear about it?

Doomsday Clock - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Doomsday Clock is a symbolic clockface maintained since 1947 by the Board of Directors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists at the University of Chicago. It uses the analogy of the human race being at a time that is "minutes to midnight" where midnight represents "catastrophic destruction". The analogy originally represented the threat of global nuclear war, but has since evolved to include nuclear weapons, climate-changing technologies and "new developments in the life sciences and nanotechnology that could inflict irrevocable harm."

The number of minutes before midnight, a measure of the degree of nuclear, environmental, and technological threats, is updated periodically. The clock is currently set to five minutes to midnight, having been advanced by two minutes on January 17, 2007.

The clock was started at seven minutes to midnight during the Cold War in 1947, and has subsequently been advanced or rewound at intervals, depending on the state of the world and the prospects for nuclear war. Its setting is relatively arbitrary, set by the Board of Directors at the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists in response to global affairs. The setting of the clock has not always been fast enough to cope with the speed of global events, either; one of the closest periods to nuclear war, the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, reached its head and resolution in a number of weeks, and the clock either could not be changed or was not changed to reflect any of this at the time. Nevertheless, the changing of the clock usually does provoke attention.
The official announcement of the most recent change to five minutes to midnight took place on January 17, 2007 at 14:30 hours GMT.[2][3]

The clock's hands have been moved 19 times in response to international events since its initial start at seven minutes to midnight in 1947, the most reason reason being:

North Korea’s recent test of a nuclear weapon, Iran’s nuclear ambitions, a renewed U.S. emphasis on the military utility of nuclear weapons, the failure to adequately secure nuclear materials, and the continued presence of some 26,000 nuclear weapons in the United States and Russia. Experts assessing the dangers posed to civilization have added climate change to the prospect of nuclear annihilation as the greatest threats to humankind.

Pretty scary shit if you think about it.
 
  • 15
    Replies
  • 407
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
No one has to worry about North Korea or Iran launching nukes, it simply won't happen. People forget that nukes are the thing that will keep WW3 from ever happening. Its the dirty bomb nuclear waste we have to worry about.
 

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
No one has to worry about North Korea or Iran launching nukes, it simply won't happen. People forget that nukes are the thing that will keep WW3 from ever happening. Its the dirty bomb nuclear waste we have to worry about.


That's a very interesting take.

FWIW, dirty bombs are over-rated. They're going to get mad propaganda value out of it, and the blast is going to hurt/damage/kill the people in the area, but nothing Hollywood spectacular.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
That's a very interesting take.

FWIW, dirty bombs are over-rated. They're going to get mad propaganda value out of it, and the blast is going to hurt/damage/kill the people in the area, but nothing Hollywood spectacular.

Terrorism isn't about killing people. Its to terrify. A small dirty bomb could potentially kill hundreds if set off in the right place, thats all it takes.
 

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
No one has to worry about North Korea or Iran launching nukes, it simply won't happen. People forget that nukes are the thing that will keep WW3 from ever happening. Its the dirty bomb nuclear waste we have to worry about.
Iran wouldn't use a nuke? That's interesting.


"As the Imam said, Israel must be wiped off the map," he (Iran's President) said, referring to Iran's late revolutionary leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. In 2001, former Iranian president Hashemi Rafsanjani speculated that a Muslim state that developed a nuclear weapon might use it to destroy Israel.

BBC NEWS | World | Middle East | Iran leader's comments attacked
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Iran wouldn't use a nuke? That's interesting.


"As the Imam said, Israel must be wiped off the map," he (Iran's President) said, referring to Iran's late revolutionary leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. In 2001, former Iranian president Hashemi Rafsanjani speculated that a Muslim state that developed a nuclear weapon might use it to destroy Israel.

BBC NEWS | World | Middle East | Iran leader's comments attacked


Its all talk. Nothing more than international bullying they are famous for. Iran isnt stupid. They know what would happen if they even thought about sending a nuke out of their country.
 

c_squared

Active Member
Messages
848
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
isn't this is antoher way to scare poeple just like everyone was worried about y2k. maybe it could come true, athough i hope not. it would be really terrible if something like that were to happen.:(
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top