Just Say No To Blasphemy Laws

Users who are viewing this thread

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
Just Say No To Blasphemy Laws- USAToday.

While attracting surprisingly little attention, the Obama administration supported the effort of largely Muslim nations in the U.N. Human Rights Council to recognize exceptions to free speech for any "negative racial and religious stereotyping." The exception was made as part of a resolution supporting free speech that passed this month, but it is the exception, not the rule that worries civil libertarians. Though the resolution was passed unanimously, European and developing countries made it clear that they remain at odds on the issue of protecting religions from criticism. It is viewed as a transparent bid to appeal to the "Muslim street" and our Arab allies, with the administration seeking greater coexistence through the curtailment of objectionable speech. Though it has no direct enforcement (and is weaker than earlier versions), it is still viewed as a victory for those who sought to juxtapose and balance the rights of speech and religion.

If the information in this article is being accurately reported, I am very alarmed by this movement. If you care about free speech, I suggest you contact your govt reps and tell them.
 
  • 7
    Replies
  • 186
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
We can't kowtow to any movement out of fear.

We need to honor the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ... "

There has been too much of religious people trying to legislate morality, and too much of non-religious people trying to eradicate religion by claiming some imagined right of freedom from religion. Our Constitution is clear. Congress can't even address the issue.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Technically, he's not pissing on the constitution. I'd misread & thought we were talking about the US, but it's the UN. So we're talking about nothing at all. The only concern I would have is if Obama tried to limit our free speech as he is clearly comfortable limiting others'.
 

nova

Active Member
Messages
799
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Technically, he's not pissing on the constitution. I'd misread & thought we were talking about the US, but it's the UN. So we're talking about nothing at all. The only concern I would have is if Obama tried to limit our free speech as he is clearly comfortable limiting others'.

US or otherwise, its still wrong. I subscribe to the theory of natural rights and no person should have their natural rights of free expression infringed upon, regardless of where they live...
 
78,875Threads
2,185,391Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top