If you don't know the constitution should you really be a politician?

Users who are viewing this thread

Dana

In Memoriam - RIP
Messages
42,904
Reaction score
10
Tokenz
0.17z
O'Donnell questions separation of church, state


'You're telling me that's in the First Amendment?' asks Senate candidate

'You're telling me that's in the First Amendment?' asks Senate candidate

WILMINGTON, Del. — Republican Christine O'Donnell challenged her Democratic rival Tuesday to show where the Constitution requires separation of church and state, drawing swift criticism from her opponent, laughter from her law school audience and a quick defense from prominent conservatives.

"Where in the Constitution is separation of church and state?" O'Donnell asked while Democrat Chris Coons, an attorney, sat a few feet away.

Coons responded that O'Donnell's question "reveals her fundamental misunderstanding of what our Constitution is. ... The First Amendment establishes a separation."

She interrupted to say, "The First Amendment does? ... So you're telling me that the separation of church and state, the phrase 'separation of church and state,' is in the First Amendment?"


Her campaign issued a statement later saying O'Donnell "was not questioning the concept of separation of church and state as subsequently established by the courts. She simply made the point that the phrase appears nowhere in the Constitution."

Conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh made the same point in his radio program soon after the debate, saying, "There's nothing in the Constitution about separation of church and state."

The controversy was the latest to befall O'Donnell in a race where she trails badly in the polls against Coons.

Coons is a county executive nominated by the Democrats for the seat held for years by Vice President Joe Biden. O'Donnell, with strong Tea Party support, burst into the national spotlight by winning the Republican primary over a longtime GOP congressman.

The subject of religion and the law came up during their debate at Widener University Law School as O'Donnell criticized Coons for saying that teaching creationism in public school would violate the Constitution.

Coons said private and parochial schools are free to teach creationism — O'Donnell used the term "intelligent design" — but that under the "indispensable principle" of separation of church and state "religious doctrine doesn't belong in our public schools."
Advertisement | ad info

He said the separation of church and state was one of a number of "settled pieces of constitutional law" worked out through years of legal development including Supreme Court decisions. He said a woman's right to abortion was another.

He noted again the First Amendment's ban on establishment of religion.

"That's in the First Amendment?" she said, smiling.

Both candidates suggested that the exchange showed the other didn't understand the Constitution.

Origin of 'separation of church and state'
The First Amendment states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The phrase "separation of church and state" is usually traced to President Thomas Jefferson. In a letter in 1802, he referred to the First Amendment and said that it built "a wall of separation between Church & State."

The relationship of government and religion continues to be debated in American law. Many argue that the First Amendment's reference to religion involves the establishment of any particular religion, an important concern to the American colonists, not a ban on all involvement between religion and government.

O'Donnell's comments, in a debate aired on radio station WDEL, created a stir in the audience.

"You actually audibly heard the crowd gasp," Widener University political scientist Wesley Leckrone said after the debate.

Erin Daly, a Widener professor who specializes in constitutional law, said, "She seemed genuinely surprised that the principle of separation of church and state derives from the First Amendment, and I think to many of us in the law school that was a surprise."

During the debate, O'Donnell argued that Coons' views on teaching of theories other evolution showed that he believes in big-government mandates.
Advertisement | ad info

"Talk about imposing your beliefs on the local schools," she said. "You've just proved how little you know not just about constitutional law but about the theory of evolution."

Coons said evolution was science, creationism a religious doctrine.

O'Donnell upset Delaware's Republican establishment last month with her victory in the primary, and former George W. Bush adviser Karl Rove has predicted she will cost the party a Senate seat.

Money has been pouring into her campaign from across the country — she raised nearly $4 million in just over a month through the end of September — but she has recently criticized the Republican establishment for not spending more to help.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39740538/ns/politics-decision_2010/?GT1=43001

:24::24::24:


I'm not a politician and I don't know the entire constitution but I think this is just common fucking knowledge!
 
  • 25
    Replies
  • 670
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

JoeCool10

Active Member
Messages
4,371
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
It actually isn't. Of course common sense tells us that it's been established, but the actual phrase is not in the constitution. But I can see why Coons would laugh at O'Donnell. Either way, both sides were right.
 

MoonOwl

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,573
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
The "Witch" gets more airtime:24: She's more entertaining than the new face of the TeaParty, Sarah ;)

Yes, I'm aware she only 'dabbled'.:willy_nilly::24:


Dana, to your question, yes, I think any politician should be able to quote our Constitution and Bill of Rights so they know what they are destroying.

Right after they submit to weekly drug tests.:nod:
 

Zorak

The cake is a metaphor
Messages
9,923
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
When did politicians become so inept or stupid?
We shall never write of these people the same way we write about Augustus or similar.
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
She does have a legitimate point though, the phrase "separation of church and state" does not appear anywhere in the Constitution. That phrase was in a letter than Jefferson wrote in 1802 that said there was, "a wall of separation between church and state", which is where we have gotten that phrase today. It has been used extensively to become synonymous with the Constitutional amendment that it is referencing.

If you look at the intent of the founding fathers though, I think it is pretty clear that they were trying to make two points with the that part of the 1st Amendment.

1) To prevent the establishment of a state-sanctioned religion
2) To prevent compulsory education containing the principles of any one religion

That all being said, I think she's a dumbass bitch that has no place in Congress, but then again that could be said about 95% of the members of Congress that we currently have.
 

Dana

In Memoriam - RIP
Messages
42,904
Reaction score
10
Tokenz
0.17z
She does have a legitimate point though, the phrase "separation of church and state" does not appear anywhere in the Constitution. That phrase was in a letter than Jefferson wrote in 1802 that said there was, "a wall of separation between church and state", which is where we have gotten that phrase today. It has been used extensively to become synonymous with the Constitutional amendment that it is referencing.

If you look at the intent of the founding fathers though, I think it is pretty clear that they were trying to make two points with the that part of the 1st Amendment.

1) To prevent the establishment of a state-sanctioned religion
2) To prevent compulsory education containing the principles of any one religion

That all being said, I think she's a dumbass bitch that has no place in Congress, but then again that could be said about 95% of the members of Congress that we currently have.
well number 2 went down the flusher... look at all the private church funded schools in America...
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
well number 2 went down the flusher... look at all the private church funded schools in America...

Uhm... what the hell does that have to do with anything? Private institution are not compulsory in any way shape or form. Parents choose to send their children to those schools. I'm talking about GOVERNMENT MANDATED promotion of one religion over another in PUBLIC schools.
 

Tangerine

Slightly Acidic
Messages
3,679
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
She was right.

She interrupted to say, "The First Amendment does? ... So you're telling me that the separation of church and state, the phrase 'separation of church and state,' is in the First Amendment?"

It is, of course, NOT.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Tim

Having way too much fun
Valued Contributor
Messages
13,518
Reaction score
43
Tokenz
111.11z
She was right.



It is, of course, NOT.

You need to listen to the debate. She doesn't even know OR understand what the constitution is. Of course the words "Separation of church and state" are not in the 1st amendment nobody in the debate said it did. Coons recited the actual words of the 1st amendment to her then explained it to her as it was interpreted by the Supreme court, which makes it precedent. So the 1st amendment does specifically address the separation of church and state and she had no clue, none. She is an idiot and proves it time and time again...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miwSljJAzqg
 

Tim

Having way too much fun
Valued Contributor
Messages
13,518
Reaction score
43
Tokenz
111.11z
Ostracize .... ridicule .... exaggerate.

Absolutely when a complete idiot like this puts them self up for political office.

Just remember, these people are on a job interview. Our job is to asses them and to make sure we are hiring the best and the brightest, not the class clown.
 

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Absolutely when a complete idiot like this puts them self up for political office.

Just remember, these people are on a job interview. Our job is to asses them and to make sure we are hiring the best and the brightest, not the class clown.
Agreed.
People seem to be using a teenage high school experimentation to deflect from truly important issues. I don't know if there's in incumbent in that race, but if there is, did anyone bring up little trivial details such as, say, a voting record? What are the candidates plans regarding Washington's takeover of the auto, health insurance, banking, and housing industries? Is the candidate still bent on fundamentally changing America, or is there one of them willing to look at our fundamentals and try to return to them?

This lady is being used as a distraction. and nobody seems to notice or to wonder what we're being distracted from.
 

Tim

Having way too much fun
Valued Contributor
Messages
13,518
Reaction score
43
Tokenz
111.11z
Agreed.
People seem to be using a teenage high school experimentation to deflect from truly important issues. I don't know if there's in incumbent in that race, but if there is, did anyone bring up little trivial details such as, say, a voting record? What are the candidates plans regarding Washington's takeover of the auto, health insurance, banking, and housing industries? Is the candidate still bent on fundamentally changing America, or is there one of them willing to look at our fundamentals and try to return to them?

This lady is being used as a distraction. and nobody seems to notice or to wonder what we're being distracted from.

All are very good questions and they are being answered here locally. The debates are very informative and telling. This is where the voters are getting the lions share of their information. What you are seeing/hearing is the national fallout from her gaffs.
Christine O'Donnell knocked the incumbent (Mike Castle) out in the primaries and it's a real shame. He was a Republican with a good head on his shoulders, he was a good fit for the area. He worked with both sides and wasn't an extremist in any sense of the word.

Issues are the most important consideration when it comes to hiring our legislators, but you cannot hire someone just because they stand on the right side of the issues. They need to be able to work within the system and when you are bat crap crazy, you will not be able to effectively do your job.
Everybody here knows she isn't serious. This is the third time she is running for Senate here. She is only "interviewing" to be a Fox news pundit/commentator. Just watch, after she is slaughtered in the election, you will see Fox news hire her, it's been her goal all along.
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
Tim said:
Issues are the most important consideration when it comes to hiring our legislators, but you cannot hire someone just because they stand on the right side of the issues. They need to be able to work within the system and when you are bat crap crazy, you will not be able to effectively do your job.

Yeah like the democrats and the republicans have been doing smimmingly for the last 30 years or so??

You liked Castle because he is a Rhino

You hate her because she is conservative

come on Tim admit it

As to her personally I don't know enough about her other than the media spin. Both positive and negative. She may well be horrible. But she can not be any worse than anybody else in office right now. A 5th grader could do a better job than the clowns running the show
 
78,874Threads
2,185,388Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top