Firefox add-ons are actin wacked

Users who are viewing this thread

Dana

In Memoriam - RIP
Messages
42,904
Reaction score
10
Tokenz
0.17z
I've got 2 plug-ins for Youtube 1 to download vids as mp3s and one to download vids now Youtube is showing 2 buttons each for both above and below the video... wtf gives?
 
  • 7
    Replies
  • 522
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

TGLucario475

Active Member
Messages
2,536
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
Chrome isn't that special if I'm honest. The only reason why it's fast is because it's like a thin piece of paper while Firefox is like a brick wall and that brick wall is more stable than a piece of paper.
 

Dana

In Memoriam - RIP
Messages
42,904
Reaction score
10
Tokenz
0.17z
Chrome sucks IMO. It doesn't save history great and it's way too simplistic for my liking.
 

Springsteen

Number 2, Rafael!
Messages
13,251
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.06z
Firefox allows me to download faster. Therefore Firefox works very well. Chrome is awful to use for me, just looks like a five year old designed it.
 

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Chrome isn't that special if I'm honest. The only reason why it's fast is because it's like a thin piece of paper while Firefox is like a brick wall and that brick wall is more stable than a piece of paper.

I prefer paper to brick by a long way. FF is so big and clunky, and it crashes often enough to make it horrible to use, if you ask me. And it's not 100% standards complaint either, it's falling behind the pack.

Plus, Chrome and Opera have awesome development tools in them. Firefox needs add ons which makes it even bulkier.

Chrome sucks IMO. It doesn't save history great and it's way too simplistic for my liking.

I love it simple. Firefox just reminds me of IE6 right now. Massive and clunky. Chrome is fast, lightweight and elegant.
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top