Death penetly for child rape

Users who are viewing this thread

Kat

Heart & Soul
Messages
8,166
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
article link


WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether a state can execute someone convicted of raping a child, one of the few remaining crimes that does not require the death of the victim to result in capital punishment.


Patrick Kennedy, 43, was sentenced to death for the rape of his 8-year-old stepdaughter in Louisiana. He is the only person on death row in the United States for a rape that was not also accompanied by a killing.


The Supreme Court banned executions for rape in 1977 in a case in which the victim was an adult woman.


Kennedy's lawyers say the death penalty for child rape violates the Eighth Amendment protection against cruel and unusual punishment.
The justices will hear arguments in the case in April.


The last executions for rape or any other crime that did not also include the victims' death were in 1964.


Forty-five states already ban the death penalty for any kind of rape and among the other five states that in theory allow it for child rapists. Kennedy's case is the only time a state has sought to execute someone. Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas allow executions in such cases.
I happen to think this is a serious enough crime to earn a quick ticket to death row.
 
  • 104
    Replies
  • 2K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

SRC

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I agree and disagree .. they take the life of the child .. and leave a different person behind most of the time effectively killing the "child" so to speak .. BUT .. once they allow this action .. when a child is abducted now you probably won't get them back. The offenders are going to end up killing more kids, in fear of getting caught or for the simple reason "well I might as well, if/when I get caught I'm getting death row anyways".

A canumdrum 4 real.
 

skyblue

KEEP THE FAITH
Messages
27,194
Reaction score
16
Tokenz
0.34z
ok the women wont understand the concept of blue balls........i wouldn't kill him......i'd eunochise him.......he'd still have some genetalia so would still get the urge.....but no equipment to release that urge.......he'd have a life of hell
 

gLing

Active Member
Messages
4,972
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
Execute them or lock them in a cell for the rest of their life, as long as they never have the chance to harm another child again.
 

Kat

Heart & Soul
Messages
8,166
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I agree and disagree .. they take the life of the child .. and leave a different person behind most of the time effectively killing the "child" so to speak .. BUT .. once they allow this action .. when a child is abducted now you probably won't get them back. The offenders are going to end up killing more kids, in fear of getting caught or for the simple reason "well I might as well, if/when I get caught I'm getting death row anyways".

A canumdrum 4 real.
Thats true also...but on the same hand...sometimes you dont get the kid back at all to begin with. Also...if you execute them...theres no way theyd ever be released to do it again.
 

SRC

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
ok the women wont understand the concept of blue balls........i wouldn't kill him......i'd eunochise him.......he'd still have some genetalia so would still get the urge.....but no equipment to release that urge.......he'd have a life of hell

The ones that are on the injections that render their gentalia useless .. usually just use inanimate objects .. to do what their genetalia won't perform.
 

GuesSAngel

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,434
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I know with being a mother I'd kill the bastard myself. Maybe with this kind of punishment there would be less children getting raped and abused.
 

SRC

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I wouldn't kill them .. then I'd go to jail and leave my child without a parent to comfort them ina time they REALLY need a parents understanding.

I might want to .. but I wouldn't.
 

HisHoliness

Banned
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I agree and disagree .. they take the life of the child .. and leave a different person behind most of the time effectively killing the "child" so to speak .. BUT .. once they allow this action .. when a child is abducted now you probably won't get them back. The offenders are going to end up killing more kids, in fear of getting caught or for the simple reason "well I might as well, if/when I get caught I'm getting death row anyways".

A canumdrum 4 real.

Interesting take. So, in your opinion, is there a chance that having death penalty in place will deter the crime?
 

SRC

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Interesting take. So, in your opinion, is there a chance that having death penalty in place will deter the crime?

In some cases it probably would .. a stiffer penalty for a crime will usually be enough to make some think twice (like the 3 strike law) .. but then again you have some that just simply do it anyways (obviously if they are raping anyone .. much less a child .. knowing they will get in trouble).

Just seems like the kid is usually the one who tattles and gets them in trouble for raping them .. a mouth that doesn't talk .. isn't gonna tell on you. :(
 

Pudding Time

Banned
Messages
2,933
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
This is just a late night idea, but what not force these people into slave labour instead of killing them? IMO it's just as civil/uncivil.
 

Breath

Banned!
Messages
3,824
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
ok the women wont understand the concept of blue balls........i wouldn't kill him......i'd eunochise him.......he'd still have some genetalia so would still get the urge.....but no equipment to release that urge.......he'd have a life of hell

Women do understand the concept of blue balls, fyi.
I like the idea of making them a eunuch. Removal of the testicles effectively wipes out most of their testosterone production. Problem solved.
 

SRC

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Women do understand the concept of blue balls, fyi.
I like the idea of making them a eunuch. Removal of the testicles effectively wipes out most of their testosterone production. Problem solved.

I've watched many a show on Discovery and the Health channel that takl about men who have been castrated for repeat rape offenses .. they say it works 50/50.

Some of them still think about it, but just can't do anything (with their own body) but still think about it (just like a male dog that is fixed but will still hump your leg) and since they cannot do it themselves .. they'll just use objects instead.

Most rapists don't rape for sexual pleasure alone .. it's usually a dominance/power/violence thing.
 

SRC

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Actually they no longer remove the genetalia, they use chemical castration instead. :)
 
78,875Threads
2,185,391Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top