Darwin Film Too Controversial For The USA

Users who are viewing this thread

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Give me strength!:willy_nilly:

Charles Darwin film 'too controversial for religious America'

A British film about Charles Darwin has failed to find a US distributor because his theory of evolution is too controversial for American audiences, according to its producer.



By Anita Singh, Showbusiness Editor
Published: 4:53PM BST 11 Sep 2009
Comments 436 | Comment on this article

creation_1479638c.jpg
Paul Bettany plays Charles Darwin in Creation Photo: ALLSTAR


Creation, starring Paul Bettany, details Darwin's "struggle between faith and reason" as he wrote On The Origin of Species. It depicts him as a man who loses faith in God following the death of his beloved 10-year-old daughter, Annie.

The film was chosen to open the Toronto Film Festival and has its British premiere on Sunday. It has been sold in almost every territory around the world, from Australia to Scandinavia.



However, US distributors have resolutely passed on a film which will prove hugely divisive in a country where, according to a Gallup poll conducted in February, only 39 per cent of Americans believe in the theory of evolution.
Movieguide.org, an influential site which reviews films from a Christian perspective, described Darwin as the father of eugenics and denounced him as "a racist, a bigot and an 1800s naturalist whose legacy is mass murder". His "half-baked theory" directly influenced Adolf Hitler and led to "atrocities, crimes against humanity, cloning and genetic engineering", the site stated.
The film has sparked fierce debate on US Christian websites, with a typical comment dismissing evolution as "a silly theory with a serious lack of evidence to support it despite over a century of trying".
Jeremy Thomas, the Oscar-winning producer of Creation, said he was astonished that such attitudes exist 150 years after On The Origin of Species was published.
"That's what we're up against. In 2009. It's amazing," he said.
"The film has no distributor in America. It has got a deal everywhere else in the world but in the US, and it's because of what the film is about. People have been saying this is the best film they've seen all year, yet nobody in the US has picked it up.
"It is unbelievable to us that this is still a really hot potato in America. There's still a great belief that He made the world in six days. It's quite difficult for we in the UK to imagine religion in America. We live in a country which is no longer so religious. But in the US, outside of New York and LA, religion rules.
"Charles Darwin is, I suppose, the hero of the film. But we tried to make the film in a very even-handed way. Darwin wasn't saying 'kill all religion', he never said such a thing, but he is a totem for people."
Creation was developed by BBC Films and the UK Film Council, and stars Bettany's real-life wife Jennifer Connelly as Darwin's deeply religious wife, Emma. It is based on the book, Annie's Box, by Darwin's great-great-grandson, Randal Keynes, and portrays the naturalist as a family man tormented by the death in 1851 of Annie, his favourite child. She is played in the film by 10-year-old newcomer Martha West, the daughter of The Wire star Dominic West.
Early reviews have raved about the film. The Hollywood Reporter said: "It would be a great shame if those with religious convictions spurned the film out of hand as they will find it even-handed and wise."
Mr Thomas, whose previous films include The Last Emperor and Merry Christmas Mr Lawrence, said he hoped the reviews would help to secure a distributor. In the UK, special screenings have been set up for Christian groups.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...-too-controversial-for-religious-America.html
 
  • 37
    Replies
  • 826
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Dana

In Memoriam - RIP
Messages
42,904
Reaction score
10
Tokenz
0.17z
Oh gimmie a fucking break... Who took this poll anyways? They can't be speaking for the entire country. Only 39%? Are we that narrow minded?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
A British film about Charles Darwin has failed to find a US distributor because his theory of evolution is too controversial for American audiences, according to its producer.

That is his opinion and I don't believe the percentage is accurate. Not to say this film would be a mega-hit and that could be a reason why no distributor has yet been found. At least is should be available in rentals. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JanieDough

V.I.P User
Messages
14,684
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
Give me strength!:willy_nilly:

Charles Darwin film 'too controversial for religious America'

A British film about Charles Darwin has failed to find a US distributor because his theory of evolution is too controversial for American audiences, according to its producer.


yeah but there are shitloads of "foreign" films out there that can't find distributors in the US, and it is not always because we "can't handle it"

a lot of times it has to do with competition and US companies thinking it just wouldn't translate

do you know how hard it is to get good French films here! Impossible!
 

nova

Active Member
Messages
799
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
:24::24::24::24::24:

They Should Have Called It “Darwin: The Revengination” « Whatever

A producer of Creation, the film about Charles Darwin and his wife Emma, starring Paul Bettany and his real-life wife Jennifer Connelly, is griping that the film has no distributor in the US, apparently because so many Americans are evolution-hating mouth-breathers that no one wants the touch the thing; it’s just too darn controversial.

Well, it may be that. Alternately, and leaving aside any discussion of the actual quality of the film, it may be that a quiet story about the difficult relationship between an increasingly agnostic 19th Century British scientist and his increasingly devout wife, thrown into sharp relief by the death of their beloved 10-year-old daughter, performed by mid-list stars, is not exactly the sort of film that’s going to draw in a huge winter holiday crowd, regardless of whether that scientist happens to be Darwin or not, and that these facts are rather more pertinent, from a potential distributor’s point of view.

The major US studios are no longer really tuned to distribute films like this in any event. Maybe if Charles Darwin were played by Will Smith, was a gun-toting robot sent back from the future to learn how to love, and to kill the crap out of the alien baby eaters cleverly disguised as Galapagos tortoises, and then some way were contrived for Jennifer Connelly to expose her breasts to RoboDarwin two-thirds of the way through the film, and there were explosions and lasers and stunt men flying 150 feet into the air, then we might be talking wide-release from a modern major studio. Otherwise, you know, not so much. The “oh, it’s too controversial for Americans” comment is, I suspect, a bit of face-saving rationalization from a producer flummoxed that such an obvious bit of Oscar-trollery such as this film has been to date widely ignored by the people he assumed would fall over themselves to have such a thing.
 

Margene

Member
Messages
10,191
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Without getting defensive, I too wonder about the poll. But after our presidential election and the assertions made by a candidate that the earth is only thousands of years old, some distributors might be hesitant, but certainly not all.

I wonder further, with the caliber of the director and lead actors involved, Oscar winner Jennifer Connelly among them, I find it difficult to understand why it wouldn't find a distributor, immediately.

How bizarre. It's not block buster material, but it sounds like a serious and possibly an Oscar contender, again, given the names involved.

How sad if it does have anything to do with how creationism is viewed in this country.
 

MoonOwl

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,573
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
39%!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please say it cannot be........................ No wonder we're in the frelled up political mess we're in....

That's it. Officially I am now Swiss.......
 

Margene

Member
Messages
10,191
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
39%!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please say it cannot be........................ No wonder we're in the frelled up political mess we're in....

That's it. Officially I am now Swiss.......

Mmmmmm uh!! That is very distressing Moonie. How can it be? What, were the dinosaurs running around with human beings? How come they aren't in the bible?
 

MoonOwl

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,573
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
Mmmmmm uh!! That is very distressing Moonie. How can it be? What, were the dinosaurs running around with human beings? How come they aren't in the bible?


Well, there were Behemoths in the Bible. Whatever they were....... Big animals of some kind..

But still... I am so over the debate. I now believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster thank you very much... :willy_nilly:

Thankfully, even up here in the sticks, PBBB is being taught Evolution in her public school. If she wasn't, I'd pull her out.
 

Margene

Member
Messages
10,191
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Well, there were Behemoths in the Bible. Whatever they were....... Big animals of some kind..

But still... I am so over the debate. I now believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster thank you very much... :willy_nilly:

Thankfully, even up here in the sticks, PBBB is being taught Evolution in her public school. If she wasn't, I'd pull her out.


I forgot about behemoths, and they may as well have been Flying Spaghetti Monsters. :D

I'm with you on the teaching of Evolution. I would do the same thing. I get really worried about what kids are learning in science class these days. :nod:
 
78,875Threads
2,185,391Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top