Better Care For Our Vets

Users who are viewing this thread

alleycat

Minor
Messages
2,095
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
From: Gary L. Bauer, Chairman Campaign for Working Families


Better Care For Our Vets

A bi-partisan presidential commission, co-chaired by former Senator Bob Dole (R) and former Clinton Cabinet Secretary Donna Shalala, delivered its report to the White House yesterday and called for fundamental reform of the medical care for returning U.S. veterans. This report is an oddity in today’s politically divided Washington, avoiding, as Dole put it, “a whitewash or a witch-hunt.” Thank God for that. Now let’s see real action and not more empty rhetoric. The president has a real opportunity here to show that his administration is capable of real reform. In fact, if Bush is looking for a “legacy,” I can’t think of a better one than using his last 18 months in office to do whatever is necessary to ensure that America’s battlefield warriors get the finest, highest quality care possible when they return home. Sadly, we live in a time when our military is at war, but the American people are not. While our best and brightest literally put life and limb on the line fighting the jihadists, too many of the rest of us are more concerned with the latest Hollywood loser in the headlines, fattening our own bank accounts and avoiding sacrifice or inconvenience of any kind. History will not judge us well. But, perhaps we can regain at least a little bit of our honor by making it clear to Washington’s political establishment that we want our veterans to be treated like the heroes they are.
 
  • 11
    Replies
  • 334
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
From: Gary L. Bauer, Chairman Campaign for Working Families


Better Care For Our Vets

A bi-partisan presidential commission, co-chaired by former Senator Bob Dole (R) and former Clinton Cabinet Secretary Donna Shalala, delivered its report to the White House yesterday and called for fundamental reform of the medical care for returning U.S. veterans. This report is an oddity in today’s politically divided Washington, avoiding, as Dole put it, “a whitewash or a witch-hunt.” Thank God for that. Now let’s see real action and not more empty rhetoric. The president has a real opportunity here to show that his administration is capable of real reform. In fact, if Bush is looking for a “legacy,” I can’t think of a better one than using his last 18 months in office to do whatever is necessary to ensure that America’s battlefield warriors get the finest, highest quality care possible when they return home. Sadly, we live in a time when our military is at war, but the American people are not. While our best and brightest literally put life and limb on the line fighting the jihadists, too many of the rest of us are more concerned with the latest Hollywood loser in the headlines, fattening our own bank accounts and avoiding sacrifice or inconvenience of any kind. History will not judge us well. But, perhaps we can regain at least a little bit of our honor by making it clear to Washington’s political establishment that we want our veterans to be treated like the heroes they are.
EDIT: Never mind, it seems my opinion isnt worth anything if I don't agree with the thread starter.
 

Tim

Having way too much fun
Valued Contributor
Messages
13,518
Reaction score
43
Tokenz
111.11z
"I was in college and law school during the Vietnam War and had a student deferment. Later, I was drafted, but disqualified because of a physical problem that gave me a rating of 1Y -- meaning I could not be inducted unless there was more of a military emergency."
Gary L. Bauer
Amazingly enough, when he was running for president. They went to get copies of his medical records from the military that shows why he got a 1Y rating. They were gone, cleaned up, disapeared...

Yet another politician that stands around talking about supporting the troops, while he believes the military is for the poor and the stupid, not for people like him.
 

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
I don't like Gary Bauer, bet better care for anyone isn't really a bad thing
 

Tim

Having way too much fun
Valued Contributor
Messages
13,518
Reaction score
43
Tokenz
111.11z
I don't like Gary Bauer, bet better care for anyone isn't really a bad thing

I agree with you 100%, and I agree with what AEF said earlier... I think everyone supports the troops and wants the best for them.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
I don't know what AEF said earlier since he edited his post....
It offended Alleycat's feelings or something.


All I said is that I don't know of anyone who doesn't support the troops, and what was wrong with me making money since my life goes on even when a war is going.
 

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
It offended Alleycat's feelings or something.


All I said is that I don't know of anyone who doesn't support the troops, and what was wrong with me making money since my life goes on even when a war is going.
I'm not sure if that's gonna matter soon...
 

GraceAbounds

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,998
Reaction score
2
Tokenz
0.00z
I think everyone supports the troops and wants the best for them.
I disagree. I think American citizens support our troops.

But I don't think many people on capitol hill support our troops. There are some politicians imo that think their opinion against the war is more important than the lives of our soldiers.

Voting against money for the war/soldiers would be one of those issues where I don't believe these politicians are supporting the troops. They are trying to use their vote against funds as a power play. And while I am not against power plays, this one could effect the lives of our troops and I do not agree with it at all. Regardless of whether one is for or against the war, it doesn't stop the fact that the soldiers are there right now, they need the supplies right now - nothing is going to stop that fact and to deny money needed, only serves in killing our own men.
 

Tim

Having way too much fun
Valued Contributor
Messages
13,518
Reaction score
43
Tokenz
111.11z
I disagree. I think American citizens support our troops.

But I don't think many people on capitol hill support our troops. There are some politicians imo that think their opinion against the war is more important than the lives of our soldiers.

Voting against money for the war/soldiers would be one of those issues where I don't believe these politicians are supporting the troops. They are trying to use their vote against funds as a power play. And while I am not against power plays, this one could effect the lives of our troops and I do not agree with it at all. Regardless of whether one is for or against the war, it doesn't stop the fact that the soldiers are there right now, they need the supplies right now - nothing is going to stop that fact and to deny money needed, only serves in killing our own men.

That's a good point. But I really don't think that they would allow the troops to run out of supplies just to make a political point... Maybe, but I wouldn't think so.

We could also argue the point that the members of congress who continue to support this severely flawed mission we are on, are not supporting the troops because they just hang them out there where they are being used as political pawns while they are making their 30 second sound bites on how tough they are on terror.

I guess the bigger picture that I really wanted to come across is the fact that I am 100% behind the men and women of our military. I just don't support the mission that they were given to accomplish.
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top