Australia To Pull Troops Out Of Iraq

Users who are viewing this thread

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Iraq pledge by Australia PM-elect
Australia's prime minister-elect says the country's 550 combat troops will leave Iraq by the middle of 2008. Kevin Rudd, who beat incumbent John Howard in last weekend's election, had previously promised a gradual withdrawal of Australian troops.
He made the pledge in an Australian radio interview, but said there had been no discussions yet with the US.
Under Mr Howard Australia was a keen supporter of the US-led invasion and made an early troop commitment.
Most of Australia's 1,500 troops are based in the south of Iraq, focusing on security and the training of Iraqi forces.
'Single greatest error'
Labor Party leader Kevin Rudd came to power in a landslide election victory on Saturday.
He has previously described the decision to go to war in Iraq as the "single greatest error" of Australian national security and foreign policy decision-making since the Vietnam war.


"The combat force in Iraq, we would have home by around about the middle of next year," Mr Rudd told a Melbourne radio station on Friday, adding that he would leave behind some Australian soldiers, including those providing security at Australia's embassy in Baghdad. Until Mr Rudd's election victory, the US had counted Australia as one of its few allies in the war in Iraq - although due to the small number of Australian troops deployed, their significance was largely symbolic.
US President George W Bush has warned that withdrawing from Iraq would give encouragement to the militants there.
But since being voted into office, Mr Rudd has sought to allay Mr Bush's fears. In his victory speech last weekend, he sent his greetings to "our great friend and ally the United States".
He said on Friday that he would arrange to meet US Ambassador Robert McCallum to discuss the Iraq withdrawal as soon as possible.
There are other differences between Mr Rudd and Mr Bush, notably their stance on the Kyoto Treaty on the environment.
Mr Howard, like Mr Bush, refused to sign, but Mr Rudd has already indicated his willingness to ratify the treaty.



Story from BBC NEWS:
 
  • 13
    Replies
  • 725
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
No offense but I think this American attitude to their troops is a big reason why most Australians were against it. Their soldiers are putting their lives on the line in support of the USA and are met with derision and a couldn't care less attitude from a big percentage of Americans, that's the ones who even realise the're fighting along side you.
 

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
No offense but I think this American attitude to their troops is a big reason why most Australians were against it. Their soldiers are putting their lives on the line in support of the USA and are met with derision and a couldn't care less attitude from a big percentage of Americans, that's the ones who even realise the're fighting along side you.
Again, never saw any in Iraq. Just an observation, calm down. I talked to a bunch of them and they were funny as hell, great guys. But I only saw them in Kuwait.
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
I'm not getting angry dude, it's all good. I was just pointing out an observation. I'm sure you wouldn't have been very happy if you came home from Iraq and people were dismissive about your efforts over there.:)
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Do you watch the news? :p

Tis a shame. As much as I'm against the Iraq war I have nothing but respect for people who put themselves in danger for the service of their country.:clap It's the idiots sitting comfortably behind their desk directing it that I critisize.
 

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I didn't even know they had troops! I mean, what exactly are they defending? Kangaroos? :24:

Foul.

The Aussies have always been great fighters. WWII against the Japanese would have been a bit un-doable without them.

I always found them to be fun, friendly, and fierce.

Aussie Aussie Aussie!!! :rockon:
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Foul.

The Aussies have always been great fighters. WWII against the Japanese would have been a bit un-doable without them.

Too true! I've always found it strange that Galipolli seems to be their big focus of attention in the world wars when their greatest achievement was beating the Japanese in New Guinea with chocolate soldiers. Amazing achievement!:clap
 
78,875Threads
2,185,389Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top