Audacity? Yes. Change? No.

Users who are viewing this thread

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Crisis, Catastrophe: Are These Words of Hope?
Charles Krauthammer
Friday, February 06, 2009

"A failure to act, and act now, will turn crisis into a catastrophe."
-- President Obama, Feb. 4.

WASHINGTON -- Catastrophe, mind you. So much for the president who in his inaugural address two weeks earlier declared "we have chosen hope over fear." Until, that is, you need fear to pass a bill.
Barack Obama said:
Because each day we wait to begin the work of turning our economy around, more people lose their jobs, their savings and their homes. And if nothing is done, this recession might linger for years. Our economy will lose 5 million more jobs. Unemployment will approach double digits. Our nation will sink deeper into a crisis that, at some point, we may not be able to reverse.
Barack Obama - The Action Americans Need - washingtonpost.com
It's the essential fraud of rushing through a bill in which the normal rules (committee hearings, finding revenue to pay for the programs) are suspended on the grounds that a national emergency requires an immediate job-creating stimulus -- and then throwing into it hundreds of billions that have nothing to do with stimulus, that Congress' own budget office says won't be spent until 2011 and beyond, and that are little more than the back-scratching, special-interest, lobby-driven parochialism that Obama came to Washington to abolish. He said.

Not just to abolish but to create something new -- a new politics where the moneyed pork-barreling and corrupt logrolling of the past would give way to a bottom-up, grass-roots participatory democracy. That is what made Obama so dazzling and new. Turns out the "fierce urgency of now" includes $150 million for livestock insurance.

[...]

After Obama's miraculous 2008 presidential campaign, it was clear that at some point the magical mystery tour would have to end. The nation would rub its eyes and begin to emerge from its reverie. The hallucinatory Obama would give way to the mere mortal. The great ethical transformations promised would be seen as a fairy tale that all presidents tell -- and that this president told better than anyone.

I thought the awakening would take six months. It took two and a half weeks.

Charles Krauthammer : Crisis, Catastrophe: Are These Words of Hope? - Townhall.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"That's not change. That's more of the same!"
Joe Biden
 
  • 24
    Replies
  • 512
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

SgtSpike

Active Member
Messages
807
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
All too expected, sadly. I mean, Democrats calling for efficiency and frugality in government? Sure, they may call for it, but will it happen? Not when they're the party leaders.

All this appeal to emotions bullcrap that I keep hearing from him and other Dems is really starting to get on my nerves. It's like they don't WANT people to think logically, they just want to force people to do things by presenting emotional situations and playing off of them. What conniving thieves.
 

Ryder

Mod hopeful
Messages
10,508
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Can someone explain this post to me because I don't quite understand it. Is it saying that this crisis will keep going on?
 

SgtSpike

Active Member
Messages
807
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
It's making fun of Obama, because throughout his campaign he was projecting himself as a man of hope. Now that he's actually in office, he's projecting doom and gloom so he can get his bills passed without too much trouble. And despite the fact that he called for the complete elimination of earmarks and special interests, it still appears there are some (such at the $150 million for livestock insurance).

So, it's basically saying that he's no different from any other politician. They flip flop on issues so they can get their political agendas accomplished.
 

Ryder

Mod hopeful
Messages
10,508
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
But he is a man of hope. During the Presidential debates- all of them- McCain was going to put an across the board spending freeze. That would dig us into a deeper hole. Obama's plans are more achievable
 

Strauss

Active Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
But he is a man of hope. During the Presidential debates- all of them- McCain was going to put an across the board spending freeze. That would dig us into a deeper hole. Obama's plans are more achievable

Let me understand................a spending freeze "dig us into a deeper hole" but spending a trillion dollars won't. :eek

BTW, the stimulus trillion dollars isn't part of the federal budget, that's an additional approx. 3.5 trillion dollars.

I'm just so damn stimulated.
;)
 

Ryder

Mod hopeful
Messages
10,508
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Let me understand................a spending freeze "dig us into a deeper hole" but spending a trillion dollars won't. :eek

BTW, the stimulus trillion dollars isn't part of the federal budget, that's an additional approx. 3.5 trillion dollars.

I'm just so damn stimulated.
;)

Here is what I'm saying. If McCain froze the board we wouldn't have any money to pull the troops outta Iraq and do the important things that McCain said he wanted to do!
 

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
Here is what I'm saying. If McCain froze the board we wouldn't have any money to pull the troops outta Iraq and do the important things that McCain said he wanted to do!
McCain didn't say he wanted to pull the troops out of Iraq, and he specified that military and defense spending wouldn't be touched.
 

Strauss

Active Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Here is what I'm saying. If McCain froze the board we wouldn't have any money to pull the troops outta Iraq and do the important things that McCain said he wanted to do!

:confused Each military person is rotated out of Iraq when their tour ends, the cost is already accounted for. So if they rotated each person out and did not send someone new to replace them wouldn't that result in all the troops leaving Iraq? (Yes, I understand that this is a simplistic answer but how else would you respond to this.)


As far as what McCain wanted to accomplish, it would have been a lot less expensive than 1 trillion dollars.
 

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
All too expected, sadly. I mean, Democrats calling for efficiency and frugality in government? Sure, they may call for it, but will it happen? Not when they're the party leaders.
bwah.gif
How is that any different from what the repubs have done??
 

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Can someone explain this post to me because I don't quite understand it. Is it saying that this crisis will keep going on?
Were the explanations good for you, Ryder? This guy - this author of Audacity of Hope - makes it into the White House on optimism and promises, then wants to dig us even more into debt than the previous administration, using the same phrasing of fear and panic, painting pictures of hoplessness and catastrophe.

Nothing real has changed.
 

Strauss

Active Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
RightWeb:
Charles Krauthammer, a psychiatrist-turned-award-winning-pundit who writes for the Washington Post op-ed pages, has been an influential supporter and shaper of the neoconservative foreign policy agenda.


Charles Krauthammer is many things but a neoconservative is not one of them.
 

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
I just scanned the article again. I didn't see one word about a foreign policy agenda, neoconservative or otherwise. So what was the drive-by slam about, Axis?
 
78,878Threads
2,185,399Messages
4,961Members
Back
Top