'Act of aggression' sank Korean ship

Users who are viewing this thread

Meirionnydd

Active Member
Messages
793
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
North Korea has threatened "full-scale war" after an international report concluded a torpedo fired by one of the reclusive regime's submarines sank a South Korean navy ship in March.

A multinational team of independent investigators concluded that North Korea was behind the sinking of the 1,200-tonne corvette Cheonan that killed 46 sailors.

The international team, including five Australian Defence Force personnel and experts from America, Britain and Sweden, analysed the shattered hull and parts of a torpedo found on the sea bed.
The investigators say fragments, lettering and propellers on the torpedo match North Korean-manufactured torpedos acquired by the South seven years ago.

"There is no other plausible explanation," a joint civilian and military investigation report said.

Seoul is now expected to seek tough new sanctions against Pyongyang.

The Yonhap news agency, which monitors North Korean media, said the North's National Defence Commission (NDC) broadcast a statement describing the report as a "fabrication".

The NDC, chaired by leader Kim Jong-Il, is the most powerful state organ in the communist North.
In a statement, the NDC threatened to respond to any future small border incident with a "merciless, strong, physical blow".

"Our army and people will promptly react to any punishment and retaliation and to any sanctions infringing upon our state interests with various forms of tough measures including full-scale war," it said.
Its statement described the South's president, Lee Myung-Bak, as a "traitor".

The North said it would send its own investigators to the South to check the purported evidence.
In Seoul, Mr Lee vowed resolute counter-measures against North Korea in response to the report's findings.

Rudd condemns sinking


Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said Australia condemned North Korea for the sinking, adding the key findings of the investigation were deeply disturbing.

"This hostile and unprovoked act represents a flagrant violation by North Korea of the United Nations Charter and the 1953 Korean Armistice Agreement," he said.

"The international community cannot let this act pass without an appropriate response."

The White House called the sinking an "act of aggression" and said it was "one more instance of North Korea's unacceptable behaviour and defiance of international law".

Britain said the attack was a "blatant disregard of international obligations".

"The attack demonstrates a total indifference to human life and a blatant disregard of international obligations," Foreign Secretary William Hague said in a statement.

United Nations secretary-general Ban Ki-moon called the report deeply troubling, while China described the attack as unfortunate.

China is in a difficult position because it has been trying to get North Korea to return to six-party nuclear talks, but it will now be under greater pressure to support tougher sanctions.

China is one of North Korea's only allies but even China is growing tired of Pyongyang's antics.

The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, flies to China this week and North Korea will probably be on the top of her agenda.



http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/05/20/2904613.htm
 
  • 10
    Replies
  • 342
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
they really should stop arguing, I mean, as Brüno pointed out, they're both basically chinese anyhow... :jk
 

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Holy crap. Are we going to preemptively attack and rebuild another nation? We need to give back our de facto empire, not expand it.
 

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z

As a side discussion, based on the implications of your govt dragging you into another expensive and unnecessary war which you're all paying for, this might be a good argument for some form of direct democracy when dealing with huge and important and costly issues like this.

I mean, given the chance, do you think most US citizens will happily vote a 'yes' to a new war?
 

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Our constitution requires that congress declare a war, but they haven't been arsed to formally do that since WW2. I'd have to be more versed on this subject to be of any use.
 

Kyle B

V.I.P User
Messages
4,721
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Our constitution requires that congress declare a war, but they haven't been arsed to formally do that since WW2. I'd have to be more versed on this subject to be of any use.

True, but isn't there a piece of legislation that requires the President to consult Congress if he wishes to mobilize troops for longer than a certain period of time without declaring war?
 
78,875Threads
2,185,390Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top