So what is the big deal then?
No offense but if there was no tag and no proof of insurance then he should have been given the riot act.
He should be read the riot act for something he could not have possibly had in his possession given the circumstances? They had just purchased the car and it was after normal business hours. It would be physically impossible to have obtained those things, yet by law it was perfectly legal for him to be driving the car. So why exactly should the police be chastising him? What had he done wrong? What should he have done differently.
I agree with Fred. Overzealous, asshole cop. And I'm sorry, Natasha, but this was not "doing her job." Her job is to protect and serve. She was doing neither. It was correct of her to pull the driver over. Once she discovered the circumstances, the right thing to do would have been to say "Alright... be sure you get your paperwork straight as soon as you possibly can and have a nice day." Nothing more was needed.
Last edited by a moderator: