marsh tit

[skyblue]

i spent a little while in the hide at coombe abbey

 

[freakofnature]

Nice! :thumbup

 

[skyblue]

thanks

 

[JoeCool10]

OMG It's soooo cute!!

 

[Guyzerr]

Good job Ian. I told you there was more to life than bugs.

Cute little bugger looks related to our Black Capped Chickadee's.

 

[Tuffdisc]

I like it, but it is soft around the edges a bit

 

[skyblue]

Good job Ian. I told you there was more to life than bugs.

Cute little bugger looks related to our Black Capped Chickadee's.

well,i tend to do tiny birds as a preference,its the challenge i suppose because they're rarely still for long....and in the summer big leaves dont mix from a photography point of view.....so insects it'll have to be in the warmer months:nod:

chances are that the tit family are related to chickadee's

I like it, but it is soft around the edges a bit

the thing is with wildlife is that you rarely get chance to change settings etc.....in effect you find what works then hope for some luck:nod:

 

[Tuffdisc]

well,i tend to do tiny birds as a preference,its the challenge i suppose because they're rarely still for long....and in the summer big leaves dont mix from a photography point of view.....so insects it'll have to be in the warmer months:nod:

chances are that the tit family are related to chickadee's



the thing is with wildlife is that you rarely get chance to change settings etc.....in effect you find what works then hope for some luck:nod:

I have seen some great wildlife tog's photos, they haven't come up with excuse like you have to work with what you got....admittedly that the 400D is a limited slr compared to other. The critique was never meant to offend you :thumbup

 

[Tuffdisc]

And also, you can take that noise reduction function off, doesn't really serve any good in these days of photoshop ACR6.2
:thumbup

And why the heck ProgramAE? should be Av+1:ninja

 

[skyblue]

And also, you can take that noise reduction function off, doesn't really serve any good in these days of photoshop ACR6.2
:thumbup

And why the heck ProgramAE? should be Av+1:ninja

if you have ACR6.2 that is.......and AE worked for me at the time

 

[Tuffdisc]

if you have ACR6.2 that is.......and AE worked for me at the time

I'm sure that there are other free RAW editors that are free :thumbup

 

[freakofnature]

I'm sure that there are other free RAW editors that are free :thumbup

Are there free RAW editors that cost money? :unsure: :ninja

 

[skyblue]

i use the canon utility or the adobe i have

 

[Tuffdisc]

i use the canon utility or the adobe i have

What adobe do you have?

 

[Tuffdisc]

Are there free RAW editors that cost money? :unsure: :ninja

Free RAW editors that cost money?:ninja

 

[freakofnature]

Free RAW editors that cost money?:ninja

:nod: You were talking about free RAW editors that were free so I was curious.

 

[skyblue]

What adobe do you have?

just the elements 5.....but then i only use it for light etc

 

[Tuffdisc]

http://jamesfryer.wordpress.com/2007/11/10/free-raw-editor-raw-therapee/

 

[Tuffdisc]

just the elements 5.....but then i only use it for light etc

=/ Not that I am suggesting you get cs5, but getting the latest release of elements is a worthwhile investment

No, I am not telling you to update per year elements 5 is even old for me:thumbup

 

[Guyzerr]

And also, you can take that noise reduction function off, doesn't really serve any good in these days of photoshop ACR6.2
:thumbup

And why the heck ProgramAE? should be Av+1:ninja

Just out of curiosity Tuffy when did you become OTZ's head critique person especially when you rarely post any of your shots? Just wondering.....